15 x Mopeds (Scooters)

This tender for 15 mopeds is generally clear and well-structured for a below-threshold procurement, utilizing e-procurement and providing specific technical requirements. However, the classified estimated value and the lack of explicit mention of mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds in the provided summaries are significant concerns impacting completeness, fairness, and legal compliance.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns a relevant CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the AI-extracted summary explicitly states that no specific mandatory exclusion or eligibility grounds are mentioned in the provided tender summaries, which are fundamental legal requirements for any public procurement. The missing procedure code is a minor administrative oversight.

The description of the required items (15 mopeds with specific accessories and fitment) is very clear and unambiguous. Technical requirements, performance conditions (1-month delivery), and evaluation criteria (solely on price) are explicitly stated and easy to understand.

The tender provides essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the estimated value is classified and not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The reveal date is also missing.

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement, clear and objective evaluation criteria (solely on price), and generic technical requirements that do not appear tailored to a specific company. Document access is implied via the eSourcing portal. The classified estimated value, however, hinders bidders' ability to fairly assess the opportunity's scale and allocate resources.

Electronic submission is supported, and direct URLs to the eSourcing portal are provided. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The primary practical impediment for potential bidders is the classified estimated value, which makes it difficult to gauge the financial scope and feasibility of the project.

Key dates (submission, contract start, duration) are logical and consistent. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for "Liable Person" and procedure codes.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.