Skip to main content
Tenders

Leasing of Rail Wagons

Open
Deadline
1475 days left
April 10, 2030
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
010688-2022
Value
£10,000,000
Location
Cumbria, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

April 26, 2022

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2030

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2030

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£10,000,000
Duration
96 months
Location
Cumbria
Type
Restricted Procedure
70
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This Dynamic Purchasing System has been developed to provide a compliant route to market to lease two different styles of rail wagons. Category 1 - 'Flatbed' wagons - This enables the Contracting Authority to lease all kinds of wagons like the following non exhaustive list: S70, IKA, IDA, etc.... Category 2 - Box Style Wagons - this will enable the Contracting Authority to lease all kinds of wagons like the following non-exhaustive list: JNAt, JNA, etc....

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per relevant national or EU procurement regulations (e.g., serious professional misconduct, bankruptcy, unpaid taxes, participation in criminal organizations).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
010688-2022_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) established by Direct Rail Services to lease various flatbed and box-style rail wagons, with an estimated total value of £10,000,000.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a Dynamic Purchasing System for leasing rail wagons but critically lacks essential documentation and detailed requirements, making a comprehensive assessment of its fairness and completeness challenging.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender correctly mentions mandatory exclusion grounds. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the description of a 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)'. A DPS operates under distinct legal frameworks and procedures compared to a traditional restricted procedure, requiring clarification.

Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' in the procedure type and description.
Clarity40/100

The description of the two wagon categories with non-exhaustive examples provides some initial clarity on the scope. Nevertheless, the overall clarity is severely compromised by the complete absence of any tender documents, leaving specific requirements, technical specifications, and terms undefined.

Lack of detailed specifications, technical requirements, and terms due to missing tender documents.
Completeness83/100

The tender is critically incomplete. While basic identifying information is present, the total absence of any attached documents means that crucial details such as full technical specifications, award criteria, contractual terms, and submission instructions are entirely missing, rendering the tender unworkable for bidders.

Zero documents attached, leading to missing full technical specifications, missing award criteria, missing contractual terms, and missing submission instructions.
Fairness80/100

It is impossible to assess the fairness of this tender without any attached documents. Key elements that ensure fair competition, such as detailed evaluation criteria, comprehensive technical specifications, and clear qualification requirements, are entirely unknown. While the non-exhaustive lists of wagon types are generally positive for competition, the potential for tailoring cannot be ruled out without full specifications.

Cannot assess fairness due to missing tender documents and evaluation criteria.
Potential for tailoring cannot be assessed without full specifications.
Practicality40/100

The concept of a Dynamic Purchasing System for recurring rail wagon leasing needs is inherently practical. However, the current state of the tender, with no documents available, makes it entirely impractical for potential bidders to understand the scope, prepare a compliant submission, or even determine their eligibility.

Impractical for bidders to respond due to the complete absence of tender documents and detailed requirements.
Data Consistency100/100

A significant inconsistency is present between the 'Restricted procedure' listed under 'Type' and 'Procedure' and the explicit description of a 'Dynamic Purchasing System'. This creates confusion regarding the actual procurement process and its governing rules.

Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' in the tender information.
Sustainability0/100

No information regarding green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus is provided within the available tender details. The automated check also confirms the absence of these important sustainability considerations.

Absence of green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear identification of the procurement's purpose (leasing rail wagons).
Use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) structure, which can be efficient for recurring needs (if correctly implemented).
Estimated value and contract duration are provided.
Non-exhaustive lists of wagon types in the description, promoting broader participation.

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents, making it impossible for bidders to understand requirements.
Contradiction between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' in the tender information.
Missing evaluation criteria, which are crucial for transparency and fairness.
Lack of specific location information (NUTS code N/A).
Absence of sustainability (green, social) or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all essential tender documents, including full specifications, award criteria, and terms and conditions.
2. Clarify and correct the discrepancy between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the 'Dynamic Purchasing System' description to ensure legal compliance and bidder understanding.
3. Incorporate clear evaluation criteria, including any related to sustainability or innovation, to promote best value and responsible procurement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline