Coagulator accessories

This tender for coagulator accessories demonstrates strong clarity and fairness, with a clear focus on green procurement. However, it has moderate completeness and practicality due to missing explicit contract duration and location details.

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, utilizing ESPD and electronic submission, and specifying WTO/GPA. Deadlines are reasonable, and the CPV code is appropriate. While 'Procedure: A' is used, the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic could benefit from clearer definition for international bidders.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across various categories. Evaluation criteria are explicitly detailed in Document 4, contradicting the automated check. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable.

Basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and tender validity are provided. All necessary documents and requirements are defined. However, the explicit contract duration (beyond tender validity) and a NUTS code or more specific location information are missing, impacting overall completeness.

The tender exhibits high fairness, offering full document access, disclosing the estimated value, and providing reasonable preparation time. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (98% cost, 2% environmental). E-procurement ensures equal access, and a market survey was conducted to inform the tender.

Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and the full contract duration is unclear. While the e-procurement portal serves as the document access point, a direct document URL is not provided.

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistencies are the empty NUTS code and the lack of explicit contract duration.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic and allocates 2% of evaluation points to environmental goals, which is commendable. However, there is no explicit focus on social aspects or innovation, and it is not EU funded.