Rental laundry and laundry washing service

This tender for hospital laundry services is well-structured with clear technical and financial requirements, but raises concerns regarding fairness due to its high value and lack of division into parts, potentially limiting SME participation. Sustainability aspects are notably absent.

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with reasonable deadlines, proper CPV codes, and use of the ESPD. However, the characteristic 'Negotiation Allowed' conflicts with the stated 'Procedure: A' (Open Procedure), which typically does not permit negotiation, indicating a potential procedural ambiguity.

The tender documentation is clear and comprehensive. The description of services, technical specifications (Lisa 1, 2, 4, 10), and evaluation criteria (Document 4) are well-defined. AI-extracted requirements are detailed and refer to specific supporting documents.

All fundamental information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, and deadlines, is provided. A substantial number of supporting documents are attached, detailing requirements, specifications, and submission forms, ensuring a thorough tender package.

While evaluation criteria are objective and e-procurement is enabled, the tender's high estimated value (10M EUR) combined with the explicit decision not to divide it into parts, and specific technical requirements (RFID, laundry management system), significantly limits the pool of potential bidders, potentially disadvantaging smaller and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date is clearly specified. The document access is facilitated via the national e-procurement portal. However, the exact duration of the contract is not explicitly stated in the main timeline section, though it can be inferred from financial requirements (five years).

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and sequential. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable tender status.

The tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into a significant public contract.