Design and construction works for residential buildings – in Narva and Kohtla-Järve

This tender for the design and construction of residential buildings demonstrates good clarity and fairness, utilizing e-procurement and transparent evaluation criteria. However, it presents notable issues with an incorrect CPV code and some ambiguity in procedure type, alongside a moderate focus on broader sustainability aspects beyond energy efficiency.

The tender provides a reasonable submission deadline and utilizes the ESPD, indicating compliance with EU regulations. However, the assigned CPV code '5868' is incorrect and not an 8-digit standard, which is a significant legal compliance issue. The procedure type 'E (Code: N/A)' and 'A (Code: N/A)' are also not standard, though 'E' likely refers to an Open procedure.

The project description is clear and unambiguous, detailing the scope of design and construction for energy-efficient residential buildings. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest price, and performance conditions (330 days) are well-defined. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and clearly structured.

All essential basic information, estimated value, and key deadlines are provided. Numerous documents are attached, covering various aspects of the tender. While the project duration is clear, the overall contract duration beyond project completion is not explicitly stated in the basic information. The inability to analyze all attached technical documents (due to file formats) limits a full assessment of detailed completeness, though the tender itself appears to contain them.

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access via e-procurement, disclosed value, and reasonable deadlines. The evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent. The requirement for a general contractor is justified by the complexity and warranty considerations, and does not appear tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality. The project duration is clearly specified. However, detailed financing information is not explicitly available in the basic tender overview, and the contract start date is implied rather than a fixed or clearly defined timeframe.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. However, the incorrect CPV code and the non-standard/ambiguous procedure type codes represent significant inconsistencies in the structured data.

The tender explicitly identifies as 'Green Procurement' and emphasizes 'energy-efficient' buildings, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks explicit social criteria for bidders or contract performance, and there is no stated focus on innovation. The project is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.