Peatland Restoration in the North York Moors - White Mires, Cropton Forest

This tender for peatland restoration has a clear environmental objective and good basic information, but suffers from significant issues regarding the clarity and completeness of requirements and document accessibility.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly assigned, and there are no reported disputes. However, the tender lacks a specified reveal date, and the AI-extracted requirements are notably sparse on mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and detailed financial criteria, which are standard legal requirements for transparency and compliance.

The overall project description is clear, and the evaluation weighting (60% quality, 40% price) is specified. However, the AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, financial capability, and technical capability are very generic, and the detailed criteria for the 'quality' component of the evaluation are not provided, significantly impacting clarity for bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are complete. However, the tender is incomplete regarding the detailed substance of requirements (eligibility, financial, detailed technical/quality criteria). Furthermore, 9 out of 13 listed 'documents' are login pages, meaning the actual tender content is not fully provided in an accessible manner.

The estimated value is disclosed, and e-procurement is enabled. However, the fact that 9 out of 13 listed documents are login pages significantly impedes full and immediate document access, which is a major fairness concern. The lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria also reduces transparency and objectivity for bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While the myTenders platform is indicated, direct document URLs are not provided, requiring login for access. Specific financing information beyond the estimated value is also not detailed.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the missing 'Liable Person' field.

The project's core objective of 'Peatland Restoration' inherently qualifies it as green procurement, which is a strong positive. However, the tender summary does not explicitly mention any social aspects, innovation focus, or if it is EU funded, which typically drives higher sustainability standards.