25-025 - General Building Direct Materials

This tender provides clear basic information and supports electronic submission, but its quality is significantly hampered by the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements, impacting transparency and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and deadlines appear reasonable from today's date. However, the absence of a clear reveal date, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and crucially, specified evaluation criteria are significant deficiencies that undermine full legal compliance and transparency.

The tender's description of the required materials and the client's needs is clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are understandable in their phrasing. However, the overall clarity for bidders is hampered by the lack of detailed financial and technical specifications, and most notably, the complete absence of evaluation criteria.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are well-populated. Documents are available. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements, and specific mandatory exclusion grounds, which are essential for a comprehensive tender package.

The tender provides full document access, discloses the estimated value, and supports e-procurement, which are positive for fairness. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. Nevertheless, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a severe transparency flaw, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be objectively assessed, thus significantly impacting fairness.

Electronic submission via the Delta eSourcing portal is supported, and direct URLs are provided, enhancing practical access. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of detailed financial requirements and, critically, evaluation criteria makes it challenging for potential suppliers to practically prepare a competitive and well-aligned tender.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most essential fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include empty codes for procedure type and a contradiction regarding e-submission between the description and automated checks, though the description explicitly states e-submission is supported.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.