Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure and CPV codes correctly, and the submission deadline provides reasonable time for preparation. However, the inaccessibility of key tender documents (Tender Letter, Tender Questionnaire) and the complete absence of explicit evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues regarding transparency and equal treatment.
•Inaccessible key tender documents
•Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100
The project description, background, and technical requirements are clearly articulated and specific, making the scope of work well-understood. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100
Basic tender information, financial details, and timeline are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the inaccessibility of two critical documents ("Tender Letter" and "Tender Questionnaire") and the absence of any specified evaluation criteria.
•Inaccessible key tender documents
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness35/100
Fairness is significantly compromised by the inaccessibility of key tender documents, the complete lack of transparent evaluation criteria, and the absence of electronic submission. Most critically, the mandatory requirement for API (Association of Play Industries) membership severely restricts competition and could be perceived as unduly tailored, limiting equal access for all qualified potential bidders.
•Inaccessible key tender documents
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100
Key practical details such as contract start date, duration, and budget are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission capabilities and the inaccessibility of essential tender documents present significant practical hurdles for bidders.
•No e-submission
•Inaccessible key tender documents
Data Consistency90/100
The tender exhibits good data consistency across its various sections, with logical dates and a consistent budget (allowing for currency conversion). There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and most key fields are populated.
•Minor missing fields (e.g., Liable Person, Type Code)
Sustainability50/100
While the project itself contributes to community well-being (a social aspect), the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate specific green procurement criteria, social clauses for bidders, or an innovation focus in its requirements or evaluation.
•No explicit green, social, or innovation criteria