United Kingdom4 days leftOpen

Subject Matter Experts for Early Language, Early Maths and Personal, Social and Emotional Development Learning Leads

Tender Overview

LOCATION

North East England, United Kingdom

VALUE

£1,030,460

DEADLINE

February 06, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

80000000

REFERENCE

002050-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

We are looking to appoint subject matter experts to support early language, early maths and PSED learning leads via 3 separate contracts. This requirement includes: Reviewing and providing feedback on existing DfE training modules; Developing and piloting new training modules; Training early language and early maths leads to deliver new and existing DfE training modules; Supporting early language and early maths leads to deliver training; Facilitating networking and collaboration between early language leads and early maths leads to share best practice. More detailed information can be found within the tender documentation. By improving the quality of early language and early maths provision, this investment will help more children meet the Early Learning Goals (ELGs) and achieve a Good Level of Development (GLD) to deliver on key commitments made in the Giving Every Child the Best Start in Life strategy published in July 2025.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Based on the provided information, no specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF002050-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
The Department for Education is seeking subject matter experts for three contracts to develop, review, and deliver training modules in early language, early maths, and PSED, aiming to improve early years provision across England.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documentation, making a comprehensive quality assessment impossible and raising significant concerns regarding transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

While the tender follows basic procedural steps by providing a title, reference, organization, and description, the absence of tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess full compliance with public procurement regulations regarding transparency, equal treatment, and legal certainty for bidders.

No documents attached
No document content available
Clarity40/100

The tender description provides a clear overview of the service's purpose and scope. However, without the actual tender documents, the clarity of specific requirements, deliverables, technical specifications, and contractual terms for potential bidders is entirely unknown.

No documents attached
No document content available
Completeness83/100

The provided tender information is critically incomplete due to the absence of any attached documents. Essential details such as full requirements, technical specifications, award criteria, contract terms, and submission instructions are entirely missing, rendering the tender unworkable for potential bidders.

No documents attached
No document content available
Fairness60/100

The complete lack of tender documents and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness of the competition. Without these, bidders cannot understand the playing field, and the risk of arbitrary decision-making or requirements being tailored for specific companies is significantly high. The generic mention of 'MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS' without detail further reduces transparency.

No documents attached
No document content available
Practicality40/100

From a bidder's perspective, it is currently impractical to prepare or submit a tender as no tender documents or detailed requirements are available. The procurement process itself cannot proceed effectively without these core documents being published.

No documents attached
No document content available
Data Consistency100/100

The basic information provided (title, reference, value, duration) appears consistent. However, there is a critical inconsistency between the description stating 'More detailed information can be found within the tender documentation' and the 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)' section.

Contradiction between description stating 'More detailed information can be found within the tender documentation' and 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)'
Sustainability25/100

The automated check explicitly states 'Not green procurement' and 'No social criteria'. There is no information within the provided tender details to suggest any sustainability considerations have been integrated into the procurement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number provided
Organization and a descriptive overview of the service are present
Estimated value and contract duration are disclosed
Identified as having an 'Innovation Focus'

Concerns

Complete absence of any tender documents or content, making the tender unworkable
Missing evaluation criteria, hindering fair competition and transparency
Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, reducing legal certainty for bidders
Inability to assess fairness or potential tailoring of requirements due to missing documentation
Absence of green or social procurement criteria

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documentation, including detailed requirements, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria.
2. Clearly define and publish all mandatory exclusion and selection criteria to ensure legal compliance and transparency.
3. Integrate and clearly communicate green and social procurement criteria where applicable to align with modern procurement best practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
68/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes