Provision of data on actual mass determination of freight vehicles in motion

This tender exhibits good clarity in its description and structured requirements, but is severely hampered by restricted document access, which critically undermines fairness, legal compliance, and practicality for potential bidders.

The tender defines its procedure type and CPV code clearly, and no disputes are reported. However, the restricted access to full tender documents is a significant transparency and legal compliance issue, preventing full scrutiny of requirements and evaluation criteria.

The tender title and description are clear. AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, clearly outlining categories like exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, and pointing to specific documents for detailed information.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, duration, and location (NUTS code), is provided. However, the restricted access to the full tender documents means that the complete set of information is not practically available to all bidders.

The disclosed value and reasonable submission deadline contribute positively. However, the critical issue of restricted document access severely compromises fairness, as it prevents equal access to essential information for all potential bidders, making objective assessment of requirements and evaluation criteria impossible.

E-procurement is indicated, and the opening place suggests electronic submission, which is practical. However, the lack of a direct document URL and the restricted access to full documents significantly hinder bidders' ability to practically prepare and submit a comprehensive proposal. The contract start date is also not specified.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and most fields are populated. However, there are notable contradictions, particularly between the characteristic 'E-Procurement' and the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag, and the fundamental issue of 'Restricted document access' despite summaries being generated.

The tender shows no explicit focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.