Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly states its purpose as preliminary market engagement, which is a legitimate pre-procurement activity. Deadlines are reasonable, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are marked as 'None', which is a significant data entry deficiency, though the textual description clarifies the intent.
•Missing formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes in structured data
Clarity80/100
The description of the requirement is exceptionally clear and unambiguous, detailing the technical operating conditions and desired capabilities for the thermal storage system. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and directly reflect the detailed technical needs. While formal evaluation criteria are not specified, this is expected for a preliminary market engagement.
•No explicit criteria for how market input will be assessed or utilized
Completeness70/100
The tender provides all basic information, including title, reference, organization, and detailed technical requirements. Deadlines and future contract duration are specified. All listed documents are available and summarized. The main gaps are the missing formal procedure type and the absence of explicit criteria for assessing market input.
•Missing formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes
•No explicit criteria for market input assessment
Fairness85/100
Full document access is provided via the Delta eSourcing portal, which also supports electronic submission, ensuring equal access. The two-month response period is reasonable for a preliminary market engagement. While the estimated value is classified, this is acceptable for an RFI. The technical requirements are highly specialized but appear generic enough within the niche, not tailored to a specific company.
•Lack of transparency regarding how market input will be assessed
Practicality80/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via the Delta eSourcing portal, and direct URLs are provided for access. The future contract start date and duration are specified, offering a clear long-term outlook. The lack of specific financing information for the PME itself is typical.
•Estimated value for the future contract is classified
Data Consistency60/100
The primary inconsistency lies in the unpopulated 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields, which are fundamental structured data elements. However, other key dates (submission, contract start, duration) are logical and consistent with the nature of a preliminary market engagement for a long-term project. No disputes or suspensions are noted.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes
Sustainability70/100
The tender does not explicitly include green procurement or social aspects. However, the core subject matter—designing thermal storage for a fusion energy reactor (STEP power cycle)—is inherently highly innovative and contributes significantly to long-term energy sustainability and technological advancement.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social aspects