Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and complies with the UK Procurement Act 2023, which is a strong positive. CPV codes are appropriate, and no disputes are noted. However, there are ambiguities regarding the actual submission deadline for the Conditions of Participation stage and some empty codes for tender type/procedure, posing minor legal risks.
•Ambiguity regarding the actual submission deadline for the Conditions of Participation stage.
•Empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields.
Clarity65/100
The framework's purpose, structure (two lots), and general process are clearly described. Eligibility and technical requirements are well-articulated for what is provided. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant clarity gap, and the submission deadline ambiguity further reduces overall understanding.
•No explicit evaluation criteria specified in the provided summary.
•Ambiguity regarding the actual submission deadline.
Completeness60/100
Basic information such as title, organization, value, and initial duration is provided. However, critical details like specific evaluation criteria, comprehensive financial requirements, and full mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly present in the provided summaries. There are also inconsistencies in key dates and the estimated value.
•Missing specific evaluation criteria.
•Financial requirements not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.
Fairness65/100
Full document access is provided via a dedicated e-procurement portal, the value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria significantly impacts transparency and objectivity, which are fundamental to fairness. The ambiguity of the submission deadline also poses a fairness concern.
•No explicit evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity.
•Ambiguity regarding the actual submission deadline.
Practicality70/100
Electronic submission is supported, and a direct URL to the procurement portal is provided, enhancing accessibility. Financing information and duration are specified. However, inconsistencies in the contract start date and submission deadline create practical planning challenges for potential bidders.
•Inconsistent contract start date.
•Ambiguity regarding the actual submission deadline.
Data Consistency40/100
There are significant inconsistencies in key data fields, including the submission deadline, contract start date, and the estimated value (EUR vs GBP). Additionally, some key fields like 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are empty. These discrepancies can lead to confusion and potential misinterpretations.
•Inconsistent submission deadline (2026-08-31 vs 2026-09-01).
•Inconsistent contract start date (2026-08-31 vs 2026-09-01).
Sustainability50/100
While the core service addresses a significant social need (education for children with complex EHCPs), the tender documentation does not explicitly integrate broader sustainability criteria, such as environmental considerations, wider social value clauses, or innovation focus, into the procurement process or evaluation.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit broader social aspects beyond the core service.