Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a clear reveal date and some procedural codes (Type Code, Procedure Code) represents minor disclosure gaps.
•Missing reveal date
•Missing Type Code
Clarity65/100
The description of the required services is clear and unambiguous, outlining the scope and operational environment effectively. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed
Completeness70/100
The tender provides essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location. Nevertheless, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and comprehensive details on mandatory exclusion grounds makes the tender incomplete for a thorough bid preparation.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed
Fairness70/100
Document access and value disclosure are positive aspects. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the bidding process. The absence of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access and efficiency.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly provided. The primary practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which can complicate the bidding process for potential contractors.
Data Consistency90/100
The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes are unpopulated, but this does not affect the overall consistency of critical data.
•Liable Person not specified
•Type Code not specified
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While not a negative factor, it represents a missed opportunity to align with broader sustainability objectives.
•No green procurement
•No social criteria