Tenders

Reconstruction of roads on Aiandiklaasi property

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
293290
Value
€80,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

This procurement addresses the reconstruction of hard-surfaced roads leading to the warehouse and production areas of Agricom Tehnika OÜ on the Aiandiklaasi property, in Täkumetsa village, Toila rural municipality, Ida-Viru County.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (5)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit a calculation of the construction works cost, plus VAT.
--The tender documents describe the conditions for submitting a bid for the road reconstruction construction works, technical specifications, and required documents.
--Bidders must provide data on at least three previous asphalt paving works to prove their qualification for participating in the tender.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm they have no tax arrears.
--Bidders must confirm they have no conflict of interest.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must have at least 3 asphalt paving works experience in the last 60 months.
--Each asphalt paving work must be at least 2000m2.
--Must submit an application.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Experience in asphalt paving works.
--The works involve excavation of existing pavement, construction of a new base structure, and construction of a two-layer asphalt concrete pavement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 80000.0 EUR.
--Must provide a calculation of the construction works cost.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
293290_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.8 KB

Tender documents include compliance conditions requiring the submission of an application, confirmation of work execution terms, construction cost calculation, work completion deadline, and proof of representation rights.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
293290_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender document outlines the evaluation criteria for road reconstruction works, where the bid price is the sole evaluation method with a 100% weighting.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
293290_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 4.5 KB

Bidders must confirm no tax arrears or conflicts of interest and must have at least 3 asphalt paving projects of at least 2000m2 each completed within the last 60 months.

Hankedokument_Aiandiklaasi_juurdepääsuteedPDF
Hankedokument_Aiandiklaasi_juurdepääsuteed.pd... -- 162.0 KB

This tender document outlines the submission requirements, technical specifications, and necessary documents for a road reconstruction project at the Aiandiklaasi property.

Lisa_1_tehniline_kirjeldus_juurdepääsuteedPDF
Lisa_1_tehniline_kirjeldus_juurdepääsuteed.pd... -- 193.4 KB

The tender describes the reconstruction of roads at the Aiandiklaasi property, including excavation of the existing pavement, construction of a new base structure, and building a two-layer asphalt concrete pavement.

Lisa_2_Osalemise_taotlus_juurdepääsuteedDOC
Lisa_2_Osalemise_taotlus_juurdepääsuteed.do... -- 40.7 KB

This document is a form where the bidder must provide data on at least three previous asphalt paving works to prove their qualification for tender participation.

Lisa_3_töövõtulepingu_projekt_juurdepääsuteedPDF
Lisa_3_töövõtulepingu_projekt_juurdepääs... -- 158.4 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the terms, deadlines, and obligations of the parties for the road reconstruction works.

Lisa_4_Ehitustööde_maksumuse_kalkulatsioon_juurdepääsuteedDOC
Lisa_4_Ehitustööde_maksumuse_kalkulatsioon_... -- 61.5 KB

The contracting authority seeks bids for the reconstruction of roads on the Aiandiklaasi property, providing a cost calculation for construction works, excluding VAT.

Lisa_5_AsendiplaanPDF
Lisa_5_Asendiplaan.pdf -- 362.4 KB

This site plan illustrates the designed and prospective asphalt concrete pavements and their construction layers for the reconstruction of roads on the Aiandiklaasi property.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of all tender documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable given the scope. The procedure type (MS) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible but can sometimes reduce transparency if not managed carefully.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements for eligibility and technical capability are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as bid cost with 100% weighting, which is unambiguous.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, not all documents are marked as required, and some key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are marked as not required, which could lead to incomplete understanding for bidders.

Key documents (technical specifications, contract draft) are not marked as required.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria are objective (solely price). While experience requirements are specific, they are common for construction tenders and not tailored to a single company. Full document access is assumed via the platform.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified in days, which is practical.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Financing information is absent.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or requirements.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined eligibility and technical experience requirements.
Reasonable submission deadline for the scope.

Concerns

Key tender documents not marked as required.
Absence of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing contract start date and financing details.

Recommendations

1. Mark all essential tender documents (technical specifications, contract draft) as required.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria or objectives.
3. Clarify the contract start date and provide financing information.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline