Tenders

UHB - The purchase of Patients Flat Lifting Kits, Air Mattresses and Parts

Open
Deadline
20 days left
March 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017633-2026
Value
£228,000
Location
West Midlands, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£228,000
Duration
37 months
Location
West Midlands
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The purchase of Patients Flat Lifting Kits, Air Mattresses, Parts, and The service Maintenance and Rpair thereof; for University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for patient lifting equipment and services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Submission deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The description of the purchased goods and services is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific requirements listed for eligibility, technical, or financial capabilities
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and start date. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the absence of content summaries for the attached documents significantly impact completeness.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The lack of specific tailored requirements suggests a fair approach. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria could be a concern for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
No financing information provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Value and duration disclosed
CPV code provided
Open procedure

Concerns

Lack of specific requirements and evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potential for a short submission deadline
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Include information on e-submission and financing.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline