Tenders

TVFCS Command & Control

Open
Deadline
229 days left
October 18, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
018179-2026
Value
£13,200,000
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 28, 2026

Deadline for Questions

October 11, 2026

Submission Deadline

October 18, 2026

Contract Start Date

October 18, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£13,200,000
Duration
84 months
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Thames Valley Fire Control Service (TVFCS) is initiating a Competitive Flexible Procedure procurement for the replacement of its Command & Control (C&C) system. TVFCS is a tri-service collaboration between Oxfordshire Fire & Rescue Service, Buckinghamshire Fire & Rescue Service, and Royal Berkshire Fire & Rescue Service. Oxfordshire County Council are undertaking this procurement on behalf of the other Fires Services. Since becoming operational in 2015, TVFCS has provided a critical shared emergency control room service, handling 999 calls and mobilising resources across the Thames Valley region, serving a population of approximately 2.5 million residents. The current C&C system (NEC Vision Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and DS3000 Integrated Communication Control System (ICCS)) is approaching end-of-life, with key infrastructure components due to become unsupported by 2029. The replacement project seeks to ensure continuity of statutory emergency response services, enhance operational resilience, and support future innovation through a modern, modular solution. Contract start date is targeted to be 19th October 2026 followed by a period of transition with a Service Commencement Date of no-later than 1/4/28 Pricing submitted must be for a 10year period commencing from a targeted contract start date of 19/10/26 and include the initial period of 7years + 3 optional extensions. All Stage 2 questions shall be evaluated using a Price per Quality Point PQP methodology which is further described in the ITT. For avoidance of doubt, Submitted Price means the total whole‑life price for the full Contract Term, including any optional extensions, implementation, licences/subscriptions, support, hosting and dual running as specified in the pricing template. PQP shall be calculated to two decimal places using standard rounding. In the event of a tie, ranking will be determined by: (1) higher Total Quality Score; then (2) higher Core Quality score; then (3) lower Submitted Price. The Price per Quality Point (PQP) is calculated as: Submitted Price ÷ Total Quality Score (TQS) = PQP

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (4)
Financial (4)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--All Stage 2 questions shall be evaluated using a Price per Quality Point (PQP) methodology.
--PQP is calculated as: Submitted Price ÷ Total Quality Score (TQS) = PQP.
--PQP shall be calculated to two decimal places using standard rounding.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Specific grounds for exclusion will be detailed in the Invitation to Tender (ITT)]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must be able to provide a replacement Command & Control (C&C) system for the Thames Valley Fire Control Service (TVFCS).
--The procurement is a Restricted procedure, implying pre-qualification may be required.
--The system must support a tri-service collaboration (Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Royal Berkshire Fire & Rescue Services).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The system must replace the current NEC Vision Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and DS3000 Integrated Communication Control System (ICCS).
--The system must be operational by the Service Commencement Date of no-later-than 1/4/28.
--The system must be supported until at least 2029, with a focus on replacing components due to become unsupported.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS4
--Pricing must be submitted for a 10-year period commencing from a targeted contract start date of 19/10/26.
--Pricing must include the initial period of 7 years + 3 optional extensions.
--Submitted Price means the total whole-life price for the full Contract Term, including any optional extensions, implementation, licences/subscriptions, support, hosting and dual running as specified in the pricing template.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is well-structured with a clear description of needs and an objective evaluation methodology. However, the absence of specific technical details and explicit evaluation criteria in the initial announcement limits completeness and clarity, while practical aspects like e-submission are not detailed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows a formal competitive flexible procedure, indicating adherence to regulatory frameworks. The CPV code is appropriate for the subject matter. While deadlines are provided, the submission deadline of October 18, 2026, for a contract starting October 19, 2026, is extremely short, suggesting a potential procedural issue. There is no information on disputes.

Extremely short submission deadline relative to the contract start date.
Clarity80/100

The description of the project's purpose, background, and the collaboration between fire services is clear. The evaluation methodology (PQP) is explained, which aids understanding. However, essential details such as specific technical specifications and detailed evaluation criteria are deferred to the Invitation to Tender (ITT), impacting immediate clarity.

Specific technical specifications deferred to ITT.
Detailed evaluation criteria not specified in this announcement.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, duration, and CPV code is present. However, the critical omission of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements, which are crucial for bidders, reduces the completeness of this initial announcement. The availability of tender documents is noted as 0 content/summaries.

No document content/summaries available.
Missing specific technical requirements.
Fairness85/100

The use of a Price per Quality Point (PQP) methodology with defined tie-breaking rules suggests an objective evaluation process. The estimated value is disclosed. Requirements are focused on the functional needs of the tri-service collaboration and operational continuity, rather than tailored to specific companies. The restricted procedure implies a pre-qualification stage, which is standard.

Practicality65/100

Key information like contract duration and estimated value is provided. The pricing structure for a 10-year period including extensions is specified. However, there is no explicit mention of an e-submission portal or process, and a URL for documents is not provided. Financing information is also absent.

No explicit mention of e-submission.
No URL for tender documents provided.
Data Consistency90/100

The key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration are populated. The contract start date and submission deadline are present, though the deadline appears inconsistent with the contract start date. There is no indication of suspension or disputes.

Submission deadline significantly conflicts with the contract start date.
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided tender details. This suggests these elements are either not a focus or will be detailed in separate documentation not yet available.

No mention of green procurement.
No mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Objective PQP evaluation methodology defined.
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.
Appropriate CPV code and NUTS code provided.

Concerns

Extremely short submission deadline relative to contract start.
Missing specific technical requirements and detailed evaluation criteria.
Lack of information on e-submission and document access (URL).
Absence of explicit sustainability criteria.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the submission deadline and its feasibility concerning the contract start date.
2. Provide details on technical specifications and evaluation criteria earlier in the process or ensure they are readily accessible.
3. Specify the e-submission process and provide a direct link to tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline