Tenders

Penistone Town Hall Phase 2 Cinema and Associated Works

Open
Deadline
23 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
015176-2026
Value
£1,800,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 15, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,800,000
Duration
5 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
64
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Create New Cinema Room, Heating Upgrade, Window Repairs/Replacements & Internal Alterations

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (5)
Compliance (3)
Technical (6)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-27T00:00:00.
--The bid must be submitted in the specified electronic format (if applicable, though not stated, it's standard for modern tenders).
--The bid must be complete and address all aspects of the tender description (Create New Cinema Room, Heating Upgrade, Window Repairs/Replacements & Internal Alterations).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS5
--The bidder must not be in bankruptcy, liquidation, or subject to insolvency proceedings.
--The bidder must not have been convicted of offenses related to professional conduct (e.g., fraud, corruption, money laundering, terrorist financing).
--The bidder must have fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of taxes or social security contributions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must be legally constituted and registered to perform the services in their country of establishment.
--The bidder must possess all necessary licenses, permits, or professional registrations required for refurbishment work in the UK (specifically, for Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council projects).
--The bidder must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The bidder must demonstrate previous experience in similar refurbishment projects (e.g., cinema rooms, heating upgrades, window repairs, internal alterations) of comparable scale and complexity within the last 3-5 years.
--The bidder must provide a list of key personnel proposed for the project, including their qualifications, experience, and roles (e.g., Project Manager, Site Supervisor, skilled tradespeople).
--The bidder must demonstrate access to appropriate equipment and resources necessary to complete the refurbishment work within the specified timeframe.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial standing to undertake a project of 1.8M EUR value. This may include a minimum annual turnover requirement (e.g., 1.5-2 times the contract value in the last 2-3 financial years).
--The bidder must provide evidence of appropriate insurance coverage, including Public Liability, Employer's Liability, and Professional Indemnity insurance, to cover the scope and value of the works.
--The bidder may be required to submit financial statements or audited accounts for the last 2-3 financial years.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides clear basic information and detailed AI-extracted requirements, but critically lacks accessible tender documents and specified evaluation criteria, significantly hindering transparency and fairness for bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined, and the submission period is adequate from the current date. However, the absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of accessible tender documents are significant legal compliance issues regarding transparency and equal treatment.

No evaluation criteria specified
No tender document content available
Clarity70/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. The major drawback is the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which leaves bidders guessing how their proposals will be assessed, significantly impacting overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are present. However, the critical absence of actual tender document content and the lack of specified evaluation criteria make the tender significantly incomplete, preventing bidders from fully understanding the scope and terms.

No tender document content available
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness55/100

The AI-extracted requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, the lack of access to full tender documents and the absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromise fairness and equal opportunity for all bidders. The lack of e-submission is also a minor fairness concern.

No full document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission and, more importantly, the inability to access the full tender documents make the process highly impractical and burdensome for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields are populated, dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The only minor inconsistency is the empty 'Liable Person' field.

Sustainability25/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and scope of work.
Detailed and understandable AI-extracted eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
All key financial and timeline information (value, duration, start date) is provided.
CPV code and procedure type are clearly defined.

Concerns

Critical absence of accessible tender documents ('Documents with content/summaries: 0').
No evaluation criteria specified, severely impacting transparency and fairness.
Lack of electronic submission option.
No explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all tender documents with full content to ensure transparency and legal compliance.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and allow bidders to prepare competitive proposals.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance practicality and accessibility for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline