Preparation of methodology and technical terms of reference for the development and integration of a conceptual territorial model of potentially contaminated sites into the Contaminated Sites Management System

Overall, this tender presents a clear description and reasonable timelines, but it has significant shortcomings such as restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value. While the core requirements are clear, transparency and completeness are notably impacted.

Legal compliance is generally good, with a clearly defined open procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and reasonable submission deadlines. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the summary's note on mandatory exclusion grounds (even if detailed in the Nolikums) slightly detract from full compliance.

The tender's title and description are very clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements are understandable, and the presence of 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' documents suggests comprehensive detail for bidders, including specified evaluation criteria.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are well-provided. However, the tender lacks disclosure of the estimated value and, critically, the contract duration, which are essential pieces of information for potential bidders.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the 'Restricted document access' and the 'Value not disclosed' issues. While the procedure is open and requirements appear generic, these two factors severely limit transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

The tender supports E-Procurement, which is a positive for practicality. However, the absence of a specified contract start date, duration, and detailed financing information, coupled with restricted document access, reduces its overall practicality for bidders.

Data is largely consistent across the provided fields, with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies, such as the 'E-Procurement' characteristic versus 'No e-submission' flag, were resolved by prioritizing explicit characteristics.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus criteria. This is a common area for improvement in public procurement processes.