Pieriga, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 10, 2026 at 10:00
Other
163939
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for water tourism infrastructure improvements in Carnikava presents a mixed quality, with clear basic information but significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness due to restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria.
The tender generally adheres to standard legal procedures, with a reasonable submission period and clear classification. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, potentially violating principles of transparency and equal treatment.
While the project description and basic requirements are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. The lack of detailed financial requirements also contributes to this.
Most essential information is provided, including basic details, timelines, and key requirements. However, the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the missing evaluation criteria represent notable gaps in completeness.
The 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' are severe fairness issues, undermining transparency and equal treatment. The undisclosed value also hinders fair competition. The requirement for floating structures experience is specific but likely justified by the project nature.
Practicality is hampered by the 'Restricted document access' and a contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' flag). A specific contract start date is also not provided.
Most data fields are populated and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. However, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission', along with the missing estimated value and evaluation criteria, indicates some inconsistencies.
The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, indicating a missed opportunity for broader sustainability integration.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes