Development of construction project and author supervision for "Cleaning works of Mēri reservoir and Rauna Mill Pond"

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements distributed across multiple documents and benefits from being EU-funded and supporting e-procurement. However, the undisclosed estimated value and a flagged potential for restricted document access significantly detract from its completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to key legal requirements, including a clearly defined open procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and a reasonable submission period of 29 days. It is also noted as EU Funded and WTO/GPA compliant, indicating adherence to broader regulatory frameworks. The absence of disputes or suspensions further strengthens its legal standing.

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across the main regulations and specific parts. Performance conditions are linked to technical specifications and contract drafts, ensuring clarity on expectations. Evaluation criteria are stated to be present within the documents, and AI-extracted requirements indicate a structured approach to detailing information.

Most essential information, such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. All relevant documents are attached and summarized, indicating their availability. However, the estimated value of the procurement is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for bidders to properly assess the opportunity.

The tender benefits from being an open procedure, divided into parts, and supporting e-procurement, which generally promotes equal access. The submission deadline is reasonable. However, the undisclosed estimated value is a major concern as it prevents bidders from accurately gauging the project's scale and market value, potentially hindering fair competition. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if it implies barriers beyond standard e-procurement portal access, also impacts fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality for bidders. The duration of the contract is clearly specified. However, the exact contract start date is not provided, only that the duration is 5 months from signing. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if it means a cumbersome access process, could reduce practicality for potential tenderers.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent (e.g., contract duration aligns with the 150-day requirement). There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor discrepancies with automated flags (e.g., e-submission, evaluation criteria) were resolved by prioritizing the content summaries and explicit characteristics, indicating the core data is consistent.

The tender is EU Funded, which often correlates with higher standards, but there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus within the provided information. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement.