Supply of individual learning materials to the most deprived persons

This tender for individual learning materials demonstrates good basic information and clear requirements, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and critical data inconsistencies regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria.

The tender defines an open procedure, assigns a relevant CPV code, and provides a reasonable submission deadline (29 days). Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' could pose a significant legal compliance risk if it prevents full and equal access to all tender documents, which is a fundamental principle of public procurement.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, referencing specific documents for details. Performance conditions are linked to technical specifications and the contract draft. Assuming the evaluation criteria are indeed specified within 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' as indicated by its summary, the tender provides a good level of clarity.

All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and key dates, is provided. The tender references all necessary documents for bidder participation and technical specifications. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about whether all information is practically available to potential bidders, impacting the overall completeness from a user perspective.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides a reasonable deadline for submission. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw that severely compromises fairness by potentially limiting equal access to information for all bidders. Furthermore, there is a contradiction regarding e-submission ('E-Procurement' characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' automated check), which, if e-submission is truly absent, would hinder equal access and transparency. No evidence of requirements being tailored to a specific company was found.

The tender specifies a contract duration and provides a NUTS code for location. However, the contradiction regarding e-submission ('E-Procurement' vs. 'No e-submission') creates uncertainty for bidders. The absence of a specific contract start date and the 'Restricted document access' further reduce the practicality for potential suppliers.

While basic fields are populated and dates are logical, there are significant data inconsistencies. The most notable are the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' listed in characteristics and 'No e-submission' in automated checks, and the discrepancy between the 'No evaluation criteria specified' flag and the summary of Document 4 which states it contains evaluation criteria. These inconsistencies can lead to confusion for bidders.

The procurement's purpose, 'supply of individual learning materials for the most destitute persons,' inherently addresses a social aspect. However, the tender does not explicitly include specific green procurement criteria, innovation focus, or additional social clauses for bidders beyond the core service delivery. It is also not EU funded.