Tenders

Roofing Services - including Planned Preventative Maintenance, Roof installations and replacements and Reactive Maintenance Works

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
016981-2026
Value
£38,400,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£38,400,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North East England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This invitation to tender is issued by North Eastern Universities Purchasing Consortium ("NEUPC") for the establishment of a framework agreement for the provision of a range of Roofing Services that will be available to all members of NEUPC, NWUPC and SUPC, where their buildings are situated within the serviced regions. To view this notice, please click here: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/delta/viewNotice.html?noticeId=989496995

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for roofing services establishes a framework agreement with a substantial estimated value. While generally well-structured, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed document content, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the procedure type.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, outlining planned preventative maintenance, installations, replacements, and reactive maintenance. The framework agreement nature is well-explained. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. However, the lack of available document content or summaries for the 4 attached documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed. The procedure is open, suggesting fairness. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Access to the full notice is via a URL.

Practicality65/100

The tender provides a URL for access, but the lack of direct e-submission details and the absence of document content reduce practicality. The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission specified
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which often implies sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services
Open procedure for broad participation
Substantial estimated value disclosed
Framework agreement structure defined

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Submission deadline may be too short
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload summaries or full content for all tender documents to improve accessibility and completeness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline