Legal Compliance75/100
The notice lacks a defined procedure type and the estimated value is classified, which are significant formal gaps. However, the CPV code is largely appropriate for the service, and the PME submission deadline is reasonable. Mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed, as expected for a PME.
•Missing procedure type
•Value classified
Clarity80/100
The project description and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear, detailing the scope, quantities, and timelines for each of the three projects. The absence of evaluation criteria is noted but typical for a preliminary notice.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
While basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are well-provided, the estimated value is not disclosed, and evaluation criteria are missing. These are key elements for a comprehensive tender.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness65/100
The classified estimated value and absence of evaluation criteria reduce transparency and potential fairness for future bidders. The lack of e-submission is also a drawback. However, the requirements do not appear tailored, and document access is provided.
•Value classified
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100
The absence of electronic submission support is a practical limitation. The undisclosed estimated value also hinders potential bidders' ability to assess the project's scale and resource allocation. Contract start and duration are clearly stated.
•No e-submission
•Estimated value not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100
The provided data, including dates, project descriptions, and quantities, is logical and consistent. The 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields being 'None' and the value 'Not disclosed' are common for preliminary notices and do not indicate internal inconsistencies in the available data.
Sustainability50/100
The core objective of the tender is a waste reduction behaviour change programme, which is inherently environmental. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly include additional green procurement, social, or innovation criteria for the supplier's operational methods.
•No explicit green/social/innovation criteria for supplier operations