Supply of fish fry for the replenishment of fish resources in the water bodies of Augšdaugava Municipality

This tender for fish fry supply is severely hampered by a critical CPV code mismatch and restricted document access, significantly impacting its legal compliance, fairness, and data consistency despite clear textual descriptions and a reasonable submission timeline.

The most critical issue is the severe mismatch between the tender's subject (fish fry supply) and the assigned CPV code (3311000 - Medical imaging equipment). This is a fundamental legal error that undermines the tender's validity and proper publication. While the procedure type is clear and deadlines are reasonable, this CPV error is a major non-compliance.

The tender title and description are clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-structured, pointing to specific documents for details on exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and evaluation criteria. However, the CPV code mismatch, while primarily a legal issue, introduces significant confusion regarding the actual subject matter for anyone relying on classification data.

Basic information, deadlines, and location are provided, and documents are listed. However, the estimated value and contract duration are not disclosed. Critically, the flag for 'Restricted document access' indicates a major deficiency, as bidders cannot fully access all necessary information to prepare a complete proposal.

The 'Restricted document access' flag is a critical barrier to fair competition, preventing all potential bidders from equally accessing tender details. The non-disclosure of the estimated value also reduces transparency. While the deadline is reasonable and evaluation criteria (lowest price for parts) appear objective, these are overshadowed by the access issue.

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement' is supported, which is a positive for practicality. However, the 'Restricted document access' significantly hinders practical engagement. Key practical details such as the contract start date, specific financing information (beyond 'not disclosed'), and clear duration are missing.

This category suffers severely from the critical CPV code mismatch, which is a fundamental data inconsistency. Furthermore, there are contradictions between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check, and between 'Documents available' and 'Restricted document access'. Missing value and duration also contribute to inconsistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. There is no indication of EU funding, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.