Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the timeline is reasonable. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds is a notable omission that could lead to legal challenges or lack of clarity for bidders regarding eligibility.
•No mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated
Clarity60/100
The project description and technical requirements are well-detailed and unambiguous, clearly outlining the scope, desired aesthetics, and technical standards. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how their proposals will be assessed, creating substantial ambiguity.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness55/100
While basic information, deadlines, value, and location are provided, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the missing 'Tender Letter' and 'Tender Questionnaire' documents, which are crucial for a comprehensive bid. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria further detracts from its completeness.
•Missing 'Tender Letter' and 'Tender Questionnaire' documents (error pages)
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness50/100
The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the unavailability of key tender documents and the complete absence of evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque. Furthermore, the lack of e-submission capabilities creates an unequal playing field and potential barriers for some bidders.
•Missing key tender documents
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality60/100
The tender provides clear contract start and duration dates, and financing information. However, the lack of electronic submission support and the apparent unavailability of full tender documents (indicated by error pages) present significant practical hurdles for potential bidders.
•No e-submission
•Potential difficulty in accessing full tender documents (due to error pages)
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. While there is a minor discrepancy between the EUR and GBP estimated values and a slight misalignment in the contract start and contractor appointment dates, these are generally minor issues that do not severely impact the overall consistency.
•Minor discrepancy between EUR and GBP estimated values
•Slight misalignment between 'Contract Start' and 'appointment of contractor' dates
Sustainability75/100
The tender demonstrates a good commitment to sustainability by requiring natural-look equipment, promoting natural shading (trees), and including DDA compliant inclusive play equipment, addressing both environmental and social aspects. There is no explicit focus on innovation.
•No explicit innovation focus