Chemical, Biological, Radiological & Nuclear Training Video Production

This tender is generally clear and well-structured, but the critical absence of evaluation criteria significantly impacts transparency and fairness. Key information is provided, and electronic submission is supported.

Deadlines are reasonable (14 days from today's date), the procedure type is clearly defined, and CPV codes are appropriate. There are no disputes or suspensions. A minor concern is the lack of specific details regarding mandatory exclusion grounds.

The project description and technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity of the procurement process.

All basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are provided. Requirements are defined, and documents are available. The major omission is the lack of detailed evaluation criteria, which is crucial for a complete tender.

Full document access, disclosed value, and electronic submission via the Atamis portal contribute to fairness. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the absence of evaluation criteria is a significant impediment to objective and transparent assessment, impacting fairness.

Electronic submission is supported via the Atamis portal, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Financing information is available. While a direct document URL isn't explicitly provided in the summary, documents are listed as available.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no suspensions or disputes. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes.

The tender encourages SMEs and VCSEs, which is a positive social aspect. However, there is no explicit focus on green procurement, broader social criteria, or innovation, which limits its sustainability score.