Delivery of hip joint endoprostheses for the needs of SIA „RĒZEKNES SLIMNĪCA”

This tender for hip joint endoprostheses demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, utilizing an open e-procurement procedure with objective evaluation criteria. However, the critical issue of restricted document access significantly undermines fairness and practical accessibility for potential bidders.

The tender follows an open procedure, specifies CPV codes, and has reasonable deadlines, indicating general compliance with procurement regulations. The 'Restricted document access' is a concern for transparency, which is a legal principle, but the tender structure itself appears compliant.

The tender description is clear, requirements are well-detailed and divided into parts, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated in the document summaries. Performance conditions are also clearly referenced.

All essential basic information, financial details, timelines, and classification are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined across the four summarized documents. However, the 'Restricted document access' significantly impacts the practical completeness for potential bidders.

While the estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price), the critical issue of 'Restricted document access' severely compromises fairness. Bidders cannot compete equally if they cannot fully access all tender documents. There is no indication of requirements being tailored.

The tender supports e-procurement, which is a practical advantage. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a major practical barrier for bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly known, though duration is.

All key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The internal data within the provided tender information is consistent, especially after reconciling discrepancies with automated checks by prioritizing explicit document content.

The tender does not include any explicit green, social, or innovation-focused procurement criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.