Vidzeme, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 11, 2026 at 09:00
Other
161611
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for furniture manufacturing and installation is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a commendable focus on green procurement. However, the undisclosed estimated value and a potential issue with document access are notable concerns.
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns appropriate CPV codes. Deadlines are reasonable, and the application of Green Public Procurement principles aligns with national regulations. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which can be a transparency concern, and the 'Restricted document access' flag, if accurate, would represent a significant compliance issue.
The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented, referencing specific technical specifications and forms. Performance conditions are clearly linked to the technical specifications and draft contract. Evaluation criteria, including price and sustainability factors, are indicated as specified within the detailed part requirements.
All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, and location, is provided. Deadlines and contract duration are specified, and a comprehensive set of 13 documents is attached and summarized. The primary deficiency is the undisclosed estimated value, which is a significant piece of information for potential bidders.
The open procedure, reasonable submission deadline, and use of an electronic procurement system generally promote fair access. Evaluation criteria appear objective, incorporating price and sustainability. The tender is divided into parts, which can enhance competition. However, the undisclosed estimated value can create an uneven playing field, and the 'Restricted document access' flag, if true, would severely compromise fairness.
The tender supports electronic procurement, indicating a practical submission method, and contract duration is clearly specified. While a specific document URL is not provided in the basic info, the presence of 13 summarized documents implies accessibility. The absence of a clear contract start date and detailed financing information slightly reduces the overall practicality for planning purposes.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, contradictions exist between the explicit tender characteristics/info (e.g., E-Procurement, Green Procurement) and the automated check results, indicating inconsistencies in the metadata or automated reporting. The undisclosed estimated value is also a data gap.
The tender explicitly integrates Green Public Procurement principles, referencing specific national regulations, and includes environmental friendliness, energy efficiency, and sustainability as evaluation criteria. This is a strong positive for environmental sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or innovation focus.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes