Purchase of Footbridges Over 8m in Length

This tender for footbridges demonstrates moderate quality, with clear basic information but significant gaps in legal requirements, detailed evaluation criteria, and practical aspects like e-submission, alongside data inconsistencies.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the time from today's date to the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the AI-extracted summary indicates a lack of explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds, which is a significant legal compliance concern.

The description of the required footbridges is clear, and the price/quality weighting for evaluation is stated. However, the absence of detailed quality evaluation criteria, along with missing explicit exclusion and eligibility grounds, significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

While basic information like title, organization, value, and duration is present, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds. Furthermore, three out of eight listed documents failed to download, and detailed quality evaluation criteria are missing.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the technical requirements appear generic. However, the lack of e-submission capabilities creates a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders. The failure of three documents to download also impedes full and fair access to all tender information.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback for bidders. Document URLs are not provided, and detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is not available.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the estimated value stated as 108,000.00 EUR and £90,000 mentioned in document summaries, which is a critical data quality issue.

The tender includes a positive mention of 'consideration of carbon footprint for delivery' and 'suitability for SMEs', indicating some awareness of green and social aspects. However, it lacks a comprehensive focus on broader sustainability criteria, innovation, or explicit EU funding for higher standards.