Selective renovation works in the building at Pāles Street 9, Riga

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency, completeness, and fairness, primarily due to restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria.

The tender faces significant legal compliance issues due to restricted document access and the non-disclosure of the estimated value, which are fundamental transparency requirements. While the procedure type and CPV code are correctly identified, these omissions are serious.

A major deficiency is the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria, making it extremely challenging for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. This omission severely impacts the overall clarity of the tender.

Key information such as the estimated value and evaluation criteria are missing. Although basic details, duration, and documents are listed, these omissions are critical for a comprehensive and transparent tender process.

The tender's fairness is severely compromised by restricted document access, the undisclosed estimated value, and the complete absence of evaluation criteria. These factors create an uneven playing field and significantly hinder transparent competition.

Practicality is hampered by the contradiction regarding e-submission support (E-Procurement characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' flag) and the reported restricted document access. The lack of a specific contract start date also adds minor uncertainty.

A notable inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' flag. The undisclosed estimated value also represents a gap in consistent data provision.

The tender explicitly lacks any green, social, or innovation criteria, and is not EU funded, indicating a minimal focus on sustainability aspects.