Social Return on Investment and Impact Evaluation Framework for Digital Inclusion - Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

This tender provides a clear description of the required services for developing an SROI and Impact Evaluation framework for digital inclusion. However, significant deficiencies exist in the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds in the provided text, and the absence of electronic submission.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the AI-extracted information is a notable gap for full legal compliance, even if these might be present in the full tender documents not fully parsed.

The description of the required services and technical capabilities is very clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria significantly detracts from the overall clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location, is present. Documents are indicated as available. However, the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and the absence of stated mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds in the AI-extracted section represent significant gaps in the completeness of the tender information.

While the requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company and the value is disclosed, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely impacts the transparency and objectivity of the process. Furthermore, the lack of electronic submission creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which aids planning. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

The key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields.

The subject matter of the tender, focusing on the social and economic impact of digital inclusion, inherently addresses social aspects. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate green procurement criteria, social criteria for bidders, or an innovation focus within its requirements.