Conducting an audit and preparing a sworn auditor's report for 2026-2027

The tender quality is moderate, but it is significantly undermined by critical deficiencies such as restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria, impacting transparency and fairness.

While the procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined and the deadline is reasonable, the restricted document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria represent serious legal compliance issues.

The service description and requirements are detailed, referencing specific documents. However, the explicit lack of specified evaluation criteria creates a significant ambiguity for bidders.

Basic information and documents are present. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of evaluation criteria are notable gaps in the tender's completeness.

E-procurement is a positive aspect. However, restricted document access, undisclosed value, and missing evaluation criteria severely compromise the fairness and transparency of the bidding process.

The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag, along with restricted document access, significantly reduces the practicality for bidders.

Data consistency is severely impacted by two major contradictions: one regarding e-procurement/e-submission capabilities and another concerning the presence of evaluation criteria.

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.