Improvement of public outdoor space near the house “Purenes”, in Zlēkas parish, Ventspils municipality

This tender for public outdoor area improvement demonstrates good basic structure and e-procurement features, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria.

The tender defines the procedure type and provides a reasonable submission deadline. It is EU-funded and uses E-Procurement, suggesting adherence to broader regulations. However, restricted document access and the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues regarding transparency and fair competition.

The tender's title and description are clear, and requirements are structured by type (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) with references to specific documents. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed, significantly impacting overall clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates that essential tender documents are not fully available. The absence of evaluation criteria further reduces completeness.

Fairness is severely compromised by restricted document access and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, making it impossible for bidders to understand the basis of assessment. The undisclosed estimated value also reduces transparency and equal opportunity.

The tender supports E-Procurement, which is a positive for practicality. Contract duration and financing information are clear. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a major practical barrier for potential bidders, and a direct, publicly accessible document URL is not provided.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency is the undisclosed estimated value.

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, but it lacks explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within its characteristics or requirements.