United Kingdom10 days leftOpen

WE_1154 PTP Karagandy

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

British Council

LOCATION

Inner London - East, United Kingdom

VALUE

£180,000

DEADLINE

February 12, 2026 at 09:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

79952000

REFERENCE

006869-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The British Council Kazakhstan is looking for Computer Delivery Exams Partners based in Karagandy, Kazakhstan.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No explicit requirements provided in the given information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidding company must be based in Karagandy, Kazakhstan.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidding company must be capable of delivering computer-based exams.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No explicit requirements provided in the given information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-02-12T09:00:00+00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data006869-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured data about the British Council Kazakhstan's tender seeking Computer Delivery Exams Partners in Karagandy.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data006869-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about the British Council's tender for Computer Delivery Exams Partners in Karagandy, Kazakhstan, detailing the buyer and tender initiation.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Technical Specifications006869-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This document outlines specific tender lots, including descriptions for Fire Engineer and Employers Agent roles, their estimated values, contract dates, and potential extensions.
HTM
Tender Notice
Administrative Documents006869-2026.html
Summary:
This document is a tender notice from Brighton and Hove City Council seeking design team consultants for redevelopment projects across two sites, Hollingdean and Whitehawk, with appointments intended to progress designs to RIBA stage 3.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

43
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender suffers from critical information gaps and severe data inconsistencies, making it highly challenging for potential bidders to understand and respond effectively. Key issues include missing detailed requirements, absent evaluation criteria, and irrelevant document summaries.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The 16-day submission deadline is reasonable, and the CPV code is plausible. However, the NUTS code (UKI41 - UK) is inconsistent with the service location (Karagandy, Kazakhstan), raising questions about applicable regulations. Missing liable person and procedure codes are minor issues, but the absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria poses a significant legal risk regarding transparency and equal treatment.

Inconsistent NUTS code (UKI41 for Kazakhstan service location)
Missing liable person
Clarity40/100

While the core description is clear, the tender lacks significant clarity due to minimal AI-extracted requirements, explicitly stating 'No explicit requirements provided' for general and financial aspects. The complete absence of evaluation criteria and performance conditions further hinders understanding for bidders.

Minimal and generic AI-extracted requirements
No explicit general or financial requirements provided
Completeness35/100

Basic tender information like title, value, and duration is present. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the severe lack of detailed requirements and the complete absence of evaluation criteria. Furthermore, the summaries of the 'Tender Notice' and 'Official PDF Version' documents are entirely unrelated to the tender's actual purpose, rendering the provided document information useless.

Critical lack of detailed requirements (general, financial, technical details)
Absence of evaluation criteria
Fairness45/100

Fairness is significantly compromised by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective assessment of bids and transparency. The eligibility requirement for bidders to be based in Karagandy, Kazakhstan, while potentially justifiable for local service, restricts competition. The lack of e-submission also creates barriers to equal access.

Absence of evaluation criteria
Geographical restriction on bidders (must be based in Karagandy, Kazakhstan)
Practicality55/100

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. While contract start date and duration are specified, the overall process is made less practical by the general lack of detailed requirements and the inability to access relevant document content.

No electronic submission supported
Lack of detailed requirements hinders practical bid preparation
Data Consistency20/100

This category scores very low due to critical inconsistencies. The NUTS code UKI41 (UK) is mismatched with the service location (Karagandy, Kazakhstan). More severely, the content summaries provided for the 'Tender Notice' and 'Official PDF Version' documents are completely irrelevant to the tender's actual description, indicating a fundamental data integrity issue.

NUTS code (UKI41) inconsistent with service location (Kazakhstan)
Content summaries of key documents (Document 1 & 2) are irrelevant to the tender
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, resulting in a low score for sustainability considerations.

No green procurement focus
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, organization, and description
Estimated value, duration, and contract start date are specified
CPV code provided and seems appropriate
No disputes or suspensions reported
Basic eligibility and technical capability requirements are mentioned

Concerns

Critical lack of detailed requirements (general, financial, performance)
Absence of evaluation criteria
Severe inconsistency in NUTS code (UK for Kazakhstan service)
Irrelevant content summaries for key tender documents
Geographical restriction on bidders (Karagandy, Kazakhstan)

Recommendations

1. Urgently rectify the NUTS code and ensure all document summaries accurately reflect the tender's content.
2. Provide comprehensive and detailed requirements for all aspects (technical, financial, performance) and clearly define objective evaluation criteria.
3. Implement electronic submission capabilities to enhance accessibility and fairness for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
43/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes