Supply and Delivery of Grounds Machinery

This tender for grounds machinery exhibits significant gaps in clarity, completeness, and fairness, primarily due to missing evaluation criteria and specific requirements, alongside a lack of e-submission. While basic information is present, critical details for a robust and transparent procurement process are absent.

The tender defines a restricted procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and missing codes for the procedure type are notable legal omissions. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The description of the required machinery is clear, and technical specifications are referenced. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, along with no detailed mandatory exclusion grounds or financial requirements, significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders.

While basic information like title, value, and deadlines are present, the tender is incomplete due to the failed download of the 'Tender Notice' document and the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, making objective bid preparation and assessment impossible. The lack of e-submission creates barriers to equal access, and the failed download of a key document further impacts transparency.

The tender provides clear contract start and duration dates. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the explicit mention of 'no specific details' for critical elements like mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria indicates inconsistencies in the level of detail provided.

The tender shows no indication of incorporating green procurement principles, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not identified as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.