Renovation of the state local road V460 Tilža - Baltinava, section 0.00 – 7.70 km

This tender demonstrates a generally structured approach with clear project details and an open procedure, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines an open procedure with a reasonable submission period and an appropriate CPV code. It is linked to an EU-funded recovery mechanism, implying adherence to EU directives. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant transparency concern, and the estimated value is not disclosed, which can hinder full compliance with disclosure requirements.

The tender's subject and description are clear. Requirements are well-structured, pointing to specific documents ('NOLIKUMS', 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības', 'SPECIFIKĀCIJA STENDAM') for detailed information. While an automated check flagged 'Missing evaluation criteria', the document summaries and AI-extracted requirements indicate their presence within the tender documents.

Essential information such as title, organization, reference, deadlines, and location is provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and 'Restricted document access' implies that not all necessary documentation is readily available to potential bidders. The 'PROJEKTA DOKUMENTĀCIJA' also lacks content extraction.

The open procedure and reasonable deadline promote fairness. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, 'Restricted document access' and the non-disclosure of the estimated value significantly impede equal access to information and fair competition. There's also a contradiction regarding e-submission.

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement' and specifies an electronic opening place, suggesting support for electronic submission, which is practical. The contract duration and financing source are clear. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a major practical barrier for bidders, and a specific contract start date is not provided.

Key dates and the tender status are consistent. However, there are notable contradictions between the automated check results and the provided document summaries/AI-extracted requirements, particularly concerning evaluation criteria, e-submission, and document access. The non-disclosure of the estimated value also represents a gap in key data.

The project is funded by the EU's Recovery and Resilience Mechanism, which often implies higher standards. However, the tender documents do not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus as specific criteria or requirements.