Provision of Services in the Public Mobile Communications Network

This tender for mobile communication services demonstrates good structural elements and clear basic information, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value, impacting fairness and transparency.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code clearly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns regarding compliance with transparency and mandatory disclosure requirements, which are fundamental principles of public procurement law.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, referring to specific documents for details. The summary of 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' indicates that evaluation criteria are specified. However, restricted document access inherently diminishes the practical clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. Furthermore, while documents are listed, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates that full content is not readily available, impacting the overall completeness of publicly accessible information.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the 'Restricted document access' and the undisclosed estimated value. These issues prevent all potential bidders from having equal access to critical information needed for proposal preparation and strategic decision-making. While e-procurement is enabled and requirements appear generic, these fundamental transparency flaws severely impact fairness.

The tender supports e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the lack of a specified contract start date and the undisclosed estimated value reduce the practical utility for bidders. Restricted document access also adds a practical barrier to participation.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There is a minor contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and an automated check flagging 'No e-submission', but the explicit characteristic is prioritized. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not identified as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.