Tenders

Provision of SolidWorks Training courses

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
013317-2026
Value
£72,000
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£72,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Other
64
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

A contract for the provision of Solidworks training courses for DSTL Staff.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit bid by 2026-03-06T17:00:00+00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Registration on the Central Digital Platform.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to provide Solidworks training courses.
--Completion of a cyber security process.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
013317-2026_ocds_record.json

The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) is seeking providers for Solidworks training courses for its staff through an open procurement process.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013317-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides structured information about a tender from the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory for Solidworks training courses for its staff, detailing the buyer and tender initiation.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013317-2026_official.pdf

This tender notice invites bids for the provision of Solidworks training courses for Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) staff, requiring completion of a cyber security process and registration on the Central Digital Platform.

Tender NoticeHTM
013317-2026.html

This tender notice invites companies to bid for the provision of SolidWorks training courses for DSTL staff, with an estimated value of £60,000, requiring completion of a cyber security process and registration on the Central Digital Platform.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a clear service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations, impacting overall transparency and fairness. While basic information is provided, critical details for comprehensive bidding are lacking.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. Compliance with national (UK) procurement regulations appears to be in place, with requirements like registration on a central digital platform. The missing reveal date is a minor transparency issue, but does not indicate a breach of compliance regarding the submission period.

Missing reveal date for full transparency of the tender period start.
Clarity55/100

The core service description is clear and unambiguous. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria significantly reduces the clarity for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly mentioned.
Completeness65/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are provided. Documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and a detailed set of evaluation criteria, which are essential for a comprehensive bid.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly mentioned.
Fairness55/100

The tender's requirements do not appear to be tailored to a specific company, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria poses a significant risk of subjective assessment, undermining fairness. The flagged 'No e-submission' (if accurate) could also limit equal access for all potential bidders.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria, leading to potential subjectivity.
Potential lack of electronic submission (if 'No e-submission' is accurate).
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the flagged 'No e-submission' is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden and reducing efficiency for bidders.

Lack of electronic submission support.
Data Consistency85/100

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, but these do not impact the overall integrity of the core data.

Empty 'Liable Person' field.
Empty 'Type Code' and 'Procedure Code' fields.
Sustainability25/100

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a complete absence of integrated sustainability principles, which is a common area for improvement in public procurement.

No green procurement considerations.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear service description and purpose.
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified.
Appropriate CPV code assigned.
No reported disputes or suspensions.
All tender documents are available for review.

Concerns

Critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria.
Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements.
Potential absence of electronic submission capabilities.
No integration of sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations.
Missing tender reveal date, impacting full transparency of the tender period.

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish all evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness in the assessment process.
2. Provide comprehensive details on mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements to ensure completeness for bidders.
3. Implement or clarify electronic submission capabilities to enhance accessibility and efficiency for all potential suppliers.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline