SCH - Amber Lodge Patient Transport Service

This tender for patient transport services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and e-submission support, but suffers from a lack of specified evaluation criteria and some data inconsistencies.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the missing reveal date and the need to refer to full documents for mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements indicate minor transparency gaps.

The service description and basic eligibility/technical requirements are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue, and the need to consult full documents for key details reduces overall transparency.

Most essential information, such as title, organization, deadlines, and duration, is provided. However, the tender lacks specified evaluation criteria, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements in the summary, and presents a value discrepancy.

The requirements appear generic and not tailored, and e-procurement via Atamis is supported. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria significantly impacts the objectivity and transparency of the assessment process, raising fairness concerns.

Electronic submission is supported, and key contract dates are clearly specified. The absence of a direct document URL in the summary and limited financing details beyond the estimated value slightly reduce practicality for bidders.

The tender generally exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and populated key fields. The primary inconsistency lies in the estimated value, which is stated differently in EUR and GBP across documents.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.