Legal Compliance75/100
The notice complies with the general principles of market engagement. However, the absence of a defined procedure type ('None') and the missing reveal date are significant data quality issues that impact transparency and formal compliance with structured data requirements for public notices.
•Missing reveal date
•Procedure type not defined in system
Clarity80/100
The description of the framework and the purpose of the market engagement are very clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are well-documented and understandable for this preliminary stage, explicitly stating that formal evaluation or technical/financial requirements are not yet being assessed.
•Performance conditions not stated (appropriate for market engagement, but a general clarity point for a full tender)
Completeness70/100
While essential information such as title, organization, value, duration, and CPV codes are present, key fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type', 'Procedure', and the 'Reveal Date' are missing. This indicates moderate gaps in the completeness of the structured data.
•Liable Person missing
•Procedure type missing
Fairness85/100
The notice demonstrates high fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, requirements for engagement are generic and not tailored, and access to information is provided via a specified e-procurement platform (MultiQuote). The explicit statement that no formal evaluation criteria are being assessed at this stage is transparent.
Practicality80/100
The tender provides clear instructions for engagement via the MultiQuote e-procurement platform, including URLs for access and registration. Key dates like contract start and duration are specified, making the process practical for interested suppliers.
Data Consistency60/100
There are significant inconsistencies and gaps in the structured data. The 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are marked as 'None', and the 'Liable Person' and 'Reveal Date' are absent. While dates provided are logical, these missing fields reduce overall data consistency and quality.
•Liable Person missing
•Procedure type missing
Sustainability30/100
The notice does not include any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate modern sustainability considerations into the forthcoming framework.
•No green procurement
•No social criteria