Reconstruction of Medumi Iespēju Primary School's educational program implementation site at Alejas Street 20, Medumi, to ensure environmental accessibility

This tender for school reconstruction demonstrates good clarity and legal compliance, benefiting from EU funding and e-procurement. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of explicit sustainability criteria are notable concerns impacting fairness and overall quality.

The tender defines an open procedure, is EU Funded and WTO/GPA compliant, and provides a reasonable submission deadline of 33 days. CPV codes are assigned, and no disputes are flagged. The primary legal concern is the undisclosed estimated value, which is a minor breach of full disclosure principles.

The tender's description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-defined, referring to comprehensive documents like the regulations and technical specifications. Performance conditions are clearly linked to the technical specification and contract draft. Document summaries indicate evaluation criteria are specified within the tender documents.

All basic information, deadlines, duration, and location details are provided. Key documents are attached and summarized. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for a public tender. While 'Restricted document access' is flagged, 'Documents available' is also a strength, suggesting it might be an AI processing limitation rather than actual bidder access restriction.

The open procedure, EU funding, and e-procurement support equal access. The 33-day submission period is reasonable. However, the undisclosed estimated value significantly hinders fairness, as bidders cannot accurately assess market value, risk, or competitive positioning. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. While the contract start date is not explicitly stated, it can be inferred from the duration post-award. Specific financing details beyond 'EU Funded' are not immediately available in the basic information.

Dates are logical, and no disputes are present. However, there are inconsistencies between automated checks and the provided tender characteristics/document summaries (e.g., 'No e-submission' vs. 'E-Procurement', 'Missing evaluation criteria' vs. criteria in documents). The missing estimated value also contributes to data incompleteness.

The tender is EU Funded, which often implies higher standards. However, automated checks explicitly indicate a lack of specific green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus within the tender requirements.