Construction supervision for the simplified reconstruction of the premises and sanitary facilities of the Smiltene Technical School Alsviķi territorial structural unit's dormitory

This tender for construction supervision services is severely hampered by a complete lack of accessible documentation and critical missing information, making a comprehensive assessment challenging and raising significant transparency and fairness concerns.

The absence of tender documents, undisclosed estimated value, and missing evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues, hindering transparency and fair competition. The placeholder CPV code '1' is also problematic and non-compliant with classification standards.

While extracted requirements provide some indication of expectations, the complete absence of tender documents means the full scope, detailed criteria, and specific forms are unavailable, leading to significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

The tender is critically incomplete due to the lack of any attached documents, undisclosed estimated value, and missing evaluation criteria. This prevents potential bidders from fully understanding the project and preparing a compliant bid.

Restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and missing evaluation criteria severely undermine fairness and equal treatment among potential bidders. Without full information, it is impossible to prepare a competitive and compliant bid, potentially favoring insiders.

The requirement for 'constant on-site presence' for a 'simplified reconstruction' project might be overly stringent or disproportionate depending on the actual scale and complexity, potentially limiting the bidder pool. The overall practicality cannot be fully assessed without the tender documents.

There is a direct contradiction between the 'Submission Requirements' stating electronic submission via EIS and the 'Automated Check Results' flagging 'No e-submission'. The CPV code '1' is also inconsistent with standard classification practices.

The automated check explicitly states 'Not green procurement,' indicating a missed opportunity to integrate environmental and sustainability considerations into the tender requirements and evaluation.