Maintenance of flower, decorative shrub, and tree plantings, acquisition and planting of plants in the public areas of Rēzekne state city

This tender demonstrates good data consistency and reasonable practical aspects, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, which severely impacts clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The tender defines a clear open procedure with a reasonable submission deadline and appropriate CPV codes. It also indicates compliance with WTO/GPA. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern regarding transparency and equal access to information, which are fundamental principles of public procurement law.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are structured by type and refer to specific documents. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged, severely undermining the tender's clarity.

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, financial details, timeline, and classification, is provided. Documents are listed and summarized. Nevertheless, the crucial omission of explicit evaluation criteria renders the tender incomplete in a fundamental aspect.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides a reasonable submission deadline, and e-procurement is indicated. However, 'Restricted document access' creates an uneven playing field, and the 'Missing evaluation criteria' makes the evaluation process opaque and potentially subjective, severely compromising the fairness and transparency of the procurement.

The tender specifies E-Procurement as a characteristic and indicates the opening place as an electronic system, suggesting electronic submission is supported. The contract duration is clearly defined. While explicit document URLs are not provided, the listing of documents implies accessibility within the e-procurement system.

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and sequential. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The only minor inconsistency is the automated flag 'No e-submission' conflicting with the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, which is interpreted as supported based on other information.

The tender is flagged for not being green procurement, lacking social criteria, and having no innovation focus. It is also not EU funded. This indicates a minimal integration of sustainability principles into the procurement process.