Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login16 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
4 documents available with AI summaries
The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) is seeking suppliers to develop six accessible active travel maps (walking, wheeling, cycling) for its constituent authorities, requiring a 500-word statement and examples of previous work for preliminary market engagement.
The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority seeks a supplier to develop clear, accessible active travel maps (walking, wheeling, cycling) for six local authorities, requiring expertise in mapping cycle routes, facilities, and key destinations, with suppliers submitting a statement of suitability and examples of past work.
The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority seeks a supplier to develop clear, accessible, and accurate active travel maps for six local authorities, requiring a statement of suitability and examples of previous work.
The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) seeks suppliers to develop six accessible active travel maps for walking, wheeling, and cycling, requiring a 500-word statement on suitability and ethos, plus examples of previous work.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender, currently in 'planning' status, provides a clear description of the required mapping services but suffers from significant omissions regarding the procurement procedure, evaluation criteria, and e-submission capabilities, impacting its legal compliance, clarity, and fairness.
The tender lacks a clearly defined procedure type and does not specify mandatory exclusion grounds, which are critical legal requirements. While the CPV code is broadly acceptable and no disputes are noted, these omissions represent significant compliance gaps.
The project description and AI-extracted requirements for the active travel maps are clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria for submissions creates significant ambiguity for potential suppliers.
Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and key requirements are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing procurement procedure type and, most critically, the lack of defined evaluation criteria.
Fairness is significantly compromised by the complete lack of evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque and potentially subjective. The absence of e-submission also creates an unnecessary barrier for equal access, although requirements do not appear tailored.
The tender's practicality is hindered by the absence of electronic submission support and no explicit document URLs, which complicates access and submission for potential suppliers. The contract start date and duration are clearly stated.
Key dates are logical, and no disputes are present. However, several critical fields such as 'Type', 'Procedure', 'Liable Person', 'Mandatory Exclusion Grounds', and 'Financial Requirements' are either empty or explicitly marked as 'None specified', indicating gaps in data population.
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects (beyond map accessibility as a core deliverable), or innovation focus in its criteria or requirements. This indicates a missed opportunity for broader sustainable impact.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required