Elimination of accident hazard of the building complex of Vilnius Jonušas Radvila Palace in Vilnius, Vilniaus St. 24

This tender for roof repair works at Vilnius Jonušas Radvila Palace is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a standard open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate for the described works. While deadlines are present, the short submission window might be a concern for some bidders. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The description of the works is provided through attached documents, including detailed descriptions of the tasks and costs for different parts of the building complex. The general and special conditions of procurement are also available, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable omission.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. A comprehensive set of 9 documents is provided, covering technical descriptions, contract drafts, and general conditions. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements in the AI-extracted section suggests these might be detailed within the attached documents, which requires bidders to thoroughly review all provided files.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern regarding fairness is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments if not clearly defined within the attached documents.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. A contract duration of 13 months is specified. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. Assuming e-submission is indeed available, the practicality is moderate. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration is specified. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline and opening date) are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.