Legal Compliance50/100
The tender correctly identifies the use of a Dynamic Market under the UK Procurement Act 2023, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the inclusion of an entirely irrelevant document (Document 2) is a severe legal compliance and integrity issue. Furthermore, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria are not detailed, which are crucial for transparency and legal soundness.
•Inclusion of irrelevant document (Document 2) for a different tender.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly stated.
Clarity65/100
The description of the Dynamic Market concept is clear and well-explained, including references to official guidance. However, critical details such as specific membership conditions, financial requirements, and especially evaluation criteria are not provided, significantly reducing overall clarity for potential suppliers.
•Specific membership conditions for the Dynamic Market are not detailed.
•Financial requirements are not explicitly stated.
Completeness55/100
Basic information, estimated value, duration, and contract start date are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed financial requirements and evaluation criteria. The inclusion of an erroneous document also detracts from the completeness and integrity of the tender package.
•Missing detailed financial requirements.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness70/100
The Dynamic Market structure is inherently designed to promote fairness by allowing continuous supplier entry and broad access for various public authorities. The value is disclosed, and an e-tendering portal is used. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and fairness in the assessment process.
•Evaluation criteria are not specified, impacting transparency and objective assessment.
Practicality80/100
The tender demonstrates good practicality by utilizing an e-tendering portal for registration and clarifications, providing clear URLs, and specifying the contract start date and duration. The estimated value is also clearly stated.
Data Consistency40/100
While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are significant inconsistencies. The classification as 'Restricted' conflicts with the detailed description of a 'Dynamic Market'. Most critically, the inclusion of 'Document 2: Official PDF Version' pertaining to a completely different procurement by another entity represents a severe data integrity and consistency failure.
•Inclusion of an irrelevant document (Document 2).
•Conflicting procedure type label ('Restricted' vs. 'Dynamic Market').
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit references to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.
•No mention of green procurement aspects.
•No social criteria included.