Tenders

Digital Telecare Goods

Open
Deadline
2019 days left
September 12, 2031
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
022693-2021
Value
£12,000,000
Location
Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

September 13, 2021

Deadline for Questions

September 05, 2031

Submission Deadline

September 12, 2031

Budget
£12,000,000
Duration
120 months
Location
Scotland
Type
Other
70
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This contract notice is for applicants to apply to join the established DPS

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

4 requirements across 2 categories

Submission (2)
Compliance (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit an application to join the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
--Ensure the application is submitted by the deadline of 2031-09-12 11:00:00.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Be a supplier capable of providing Digital Telecare Goods.
--Be eligible to apply to join the Scotland Excel Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
022693-2021_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice from Scotland Excel for suppliers to apply to join an established Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Digital Telecare Goods, with an estimated value of £12,000,000.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender notice for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Digital Telecare Goods is severely lacking in essential documentation and detailed requirements, making it highly opaque for potential suppliers.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The notice provides basic legal grounds (mandatory exclusion) but fails to provide sufficient detail on eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, which are typically mandatory for a compliant tender. The contradiction between 'Restricted procedure' and 'apply to join the established DPS' also creates ambiguity regarding the procedural framework.

Insufficient detail on eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Ambiguity in procurement procedure classification (Restricted vs. DPS).
Clarity40/100

The clarity is extremely poor due to the complete absence of tender documents and specific requirements. Key sections like technical and financial capabilities are merely headings without content, providing no actionable information for suppliers.

No tender documents attached or content available.
Vague eligibility criteria ('Be a supplier capable of providing Digital Telecare Goods').
Completeness83/100

The tender is highly incomplete, lacking all critical documentation, detailed requirements, and evaluation criteria necessary for a supplier to prepare a meaningful application. This significantly hinders fair competition.

No tender documents attached.
Missing detailed technical, financial, and capability requirements.
Fairness80/100

The extreme lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria raises significant concerns about fairness and equal treatment. Without clear, objective criteria, the process is susceptible to arbitrary decisions and lacks transparency, potentially favoring specific, unstated preferences.

Lack of clear and objective evaluation criteria.
High risk of arbitrary decision-making due to missing details.
Practicality40/100

From a supplier's perspective, it is impractical to prepare a competitive application without any supporting documents or specific requirements. The notice provides insufficient information to understand the scope, expectations, or the basis for assessment.

Impractical for suppliers to prepare applications due to lack of information.
Data Consistency100/100

There is a notable inconsistency between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the description indicating an application to an 'established DPS,' which typically implies an open procedure for joining throughout its validity.

Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' description.
Sustainability0/100

No information regarding green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus is provided, indicating a lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects within the tender notice.

Absence of green, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear identification of the procuring organization and contract title.
Disclosure of estimated contract value and duration.
Use of a CPV code for classification.

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents and detailed requirements.
Lack of specific technical, financial, and capability criteria.
Missing evaluation criteria, raising fairness and transparency issues.
Ambiguity regarding the procurement procedure (Restricted vs. DPS).
No mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all necessary tender documents, including detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.
2. Clarify the exact nature of the procurement procedure, especially the interplay between 'Restricted' and 'DPS'.
3. Incorporate clear sustainability, social, and innovation criteria where relevant.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline