Tenders

Grass Cutting Services in Klaipėda District (Gargždai and Priekulė Municipalities) Archaeological Site Management and Maintenance Services

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6721313
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Tender Opening

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€116,684
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
2,869 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Grass cutting services in Klaipėda district (Gargždai and Priekulė municipalities) Archaeological site management and maintenance services. The procurement object is divided into 2 parts: Part I of the procurement - Grass cutting services in Klaipėda district (Gargždai and Priekulė municipalities). Part II of the procurement - Archaeological site management and maintenance services.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygosDOC
26 02 27 _ Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a public procurement tender for grass cutting and cemetery maintenance services in Klaipėda district.

Pirkimo specialiosios sąlygosDOC
26 02 27 _ Pirkimo specialiosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains the special conditions for a tender concerning grass cutting and mound maintenance services in the Klaipėda district, specifying requirements for bidders and the tender process.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 79.6 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6721313.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for grass cutting and historical mound maintenance services in Klaipėda district, Lithuania, divided into two lots.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in XML format, likely for a tender concerning grass mowing services in Klaipėda district.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 103.2 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in relation to mowing services in Klaipėda district.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for grass mowing and historical mound maintenance services in Klaipėda district is generally well-structured, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial disclosure, impacting some aspects of its quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline could be considered tight given the potential complexity. No explicit disputes or regulatory issues are flagged in the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the services is clear, and the tender is divided into two parts, which aids understanding. Key documents like technical specifications, general and special conditions, and draft contract are present. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the provided data is a significant clarity gap.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, contract duration, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a key piece of information for potential bidders. Multiple essential AI-extracted requirement categories are marked as '[No information provided]', indicating a lack of detail in the AI's extraction or the tender documentation itself.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing mandatory exclusion grounds details
Fairness85/100

The tender is advertised as an open competition and mentions e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The division into parts is positive. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria prevent a full assessment of objective criteria, potentially impacting perceived fairness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and accessible, with a clear submission deadline and contract duration. It mentions e-procurement. However, the AI notes a potential issue with 'No e-submission' and there is no explicit information on financing. The document URL is not provided in the extracted data.

No e-submission (AI flag)
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. The tender is active with no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration is clear and consistent with the tender's scope.

Sustainability50/100

The tender description and CPV code do not indicate any specific requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. There is no mention of EU funding, although the procedure code suggests it.

No explicit green procurement elements
No explicit social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear division into two lots
Presence of essential legal and contractual documents (draft contract, technical specs)
Adherence to open procedure and proper CPV coding
Active status and accessible information

Concerns

Undisclosed estimated value
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific details in AI-extracted requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Potential for a tight submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Provide more granular details on mandatory and eligibility requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline