Tenders

Purchase of robotics construction kits

Open
Deadline
2 days left
March 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6716770
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 05, 2026

Tender Opening

March 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€69,654
Avg. Bids
3.6
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
1,750 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The Lithuanian Non-formal Education Agency (hereinafter - LINEŠA) together with project partners is implementing the project "Modernization of STEAM Centers" (project code 10-061-P-0001) and is carrying out the purchase of robotics construction kits
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

2 priedas_TS_robotika rinkiniai.docxDOC
2 priedas_TS_robotika rinkiniai.docx -- 47.6 KB

No content extracted

3 priedas_Pasiūlymo forma_robotika rinkiniai.docxDOC
3 priedas_Pasiūlymo forma_robotika rinkiniai.... -- 54.6 KB

No content extracted

4 priedas_Sutarties_BS.docxDOC
4 priedas_Sutarties_BS.docx -- 61.9 KB

No content extracted

4 priedas_Sutarties_SS.docxDOC
4 priedas_Sutarties_SS.docx -- 42.5 KB

No content extracted

5 priedas_Tiekėjo_subtiekėjo deklaracija.docxDOC
5 priedas_Tiekėjo_subtiekėjo deklaracija.docx -- 32.8 KB

No content extracted

MVSA bendrosios.docxDOC
MVSA bendrosios.docx -- 112.1 KB

No content extracted

MVSA_specialiosios_įranga 1 priedas_robotika rinkiniai.docxDOC
MVSA_specialiosios_įranga 1 priedas_robotika ... -- 94.4 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6716770.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of robotics construction kits by the Lithuanian Agency for Non-formal Education, intended for the modernization of STEAM centers.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6716770_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender procedure with a lowest price evaluation, requiring bidders to submit a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for robotics construction kits is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance, with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. The primary concern is the absence of a reveal date for submissions, which is a minor procedural gap.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the purpose of the procurement is well-defined. While specific requirements are not fully detailed in the extracted information, the presence of multiple attached documents suggests that detailed specifications are available within them. The main clarity issue is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and CPV code. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission impacting completeness. The availability of 9 documents is positive, though their content is not fully detailed in the summary.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, as it might limit a bidder's ability to fully assess the opportunity. However, there are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential contradiction or missing information regarding the submission method. The contract duration is short (1 month), which is practical for a focused procurement. Financing information and contract start date are not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission (contradiction with E-Procurement characteristic)
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, CPV code, and submission deadline are populated. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The 'active' status is consistent with the timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code provided
EU Funded characteristic
E-Procurement indicated
Multiple tender documents available

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the procurement.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to avoid confusion.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline