Tenders

Purchase of robotics laboratory equipment and components

Open
Deadline
8 days left
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6716455
Value
€168,595
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Tender Opening

March 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€168,595
Duration
1 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€207,877
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
487 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The Lithuanian Agency for Non-formal Education of Children and Youth (hereinafter - LINEŠA), together with project partners, is implementing
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

2 priedas_TS_Robotai.docxDOC
2 priedas_TS_Robotai.docx -- 47.2 KB

No content extracted

3 priedas Tiekėju_pašalinimo pagrindai.docxDOC
3 priedas Tiekėju_pašalinimo pagrindai.docx -- 44.1 KB

No content extracted

5 priedas_Pasiūlymo forma_Robotai.docxDOC
5 priedas_Pasiūlymo forma_Robotai.docx -- 55.0 KB

No content extracted

6 priedas_Pasiūlymu_vert_krit.docxDOC
6 priedas_Pasiūlymu_vert_krit.docx -- 49.1 KB

No content extracted

7_priedas_Tiekėjo_subtiekėjo deklaracija.docxDOC
7_priedas_Tiekėjo_subtiekėjo deklaracija.docx -- 29.0 KB

No content extracted

8 priedas_Sutarties_BS.docxDOC
8 priedas_Sutarties_BS.docx -- 62.1 KB

No content extracted

8 priedas Sutarties_SS.docxDOC
8 priedas Sutarties_SS.docx -- 41.2 KB

No content extracted

Atviro_konkurso BS.docxDOC
Atviro_konkurso BS.docx -- 120.9 KB

No content extracted

Atviro_SS_Robotai.docxDOC
Atviro_SS_Robotai.docx -- 78.4 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6716455.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of industrial robots and components for robotics laboratories by the Lithuanian Agency for Non-formal Adult Education (LINEŠA) as part of the "STEAM Centers Modernization" project.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6716455_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a tender, specifying it's an open procedure for Cycle 1, with a mandatory 'Complete Tender' file required from the bidder.

4 priedas EBVPD_Robot.zipZIP
4 priedas EBVPD_Robot.zip -- 79.4 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the procurement of robotics laboratory equipment and components for the "STEAM Centers Modernization" project, outlining mandatory technical and quality requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for robotics laboratory equipment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and EU funding. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and potentially fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and the organization is a public body. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect legal compliance if not detailed in the attached documents.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title, description, and CPV code are clear. Most required documents are listed, including technical specifications. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice reduces overall clarity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration (though short) are present. The CPV code is provided. A significant number of documents are attached, including technical specifications. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the absence of a reveal date for the opening are noted omissions.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with EU funding, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the CPV code is standard. However, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the notice could be a concern for bidders regarding transparency. The short contract duration might also be a point of contention.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and a significant concern for practical submission. The contract duration of only one month is also very short, potentially limiting the scope of work or the number of interested parties.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract duration is very short (1 month)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code and NUTS code are present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline. The main inconsistency is the 'E-Procurement' characteristic versus the 'No e-submission' issue.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' issue
Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions or requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. This suggests a moderate approach to sustainability.

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided
EU Funded and E-Procurement indicated
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Contradiction regarding e-submission
Very short contract duration (1 month)

Recommendations

1. Clarify the e-submission process and resolve the contradiction.
2. Publish explicit evaluation criteria for transparency.
3. Consider extending the contract duration if the scope of work requires it.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline